developed-responsibility
- +

Author Topic: Holyoke is a Myth...  (Read 38021 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bob Hughes

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: 0
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #75 on: April 15, 2010, 09:15:19 AM »
Will Murray's three printed articles on the Writer's Digest appeared in Alter Ego 25, 32, and 33. The section he quoted to me from was in Alter Ego 32.  There are no scans of actual Writer's Digest pages in there, but there are extensive quotes.


There were two articles on Sherman Bowles in Time Magazine, on Oct. 14, 1946 and March 10, 1947 mostly about labor relations with the four! newspapers he owned in Springfield Mass. They had been in his family for four generations before he managed to run them into the ground.  It is noted that he "divested" himself of all ownership and turned them over to his secretary to avoid lawsuits and now claimed to be merely an advertising rep.  Bowles died in 1952.  One of the newspapers is still hanging on by a thread but it's not family owned anymore.  Based on the articles I very much doubt Temerson ever "co-owned" anything with Bowles.  He might have been an employee though.

Digital Comic Museum

Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #75 on: April 15, 2010, 09:15:19 AM »

Offline JVJ (RIP)

  • VIP Uploaders
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1052
  • Karma: 58
  • paix
    • ImageS Magazine
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #76 on: April 15, 2010, 11:35:56 AM »
Thanks, Bob,
I'll have to wait a bit before tackling the AE (they're upstairs and tricky to get at). I've read the Time Magazine pieces, not much germane to our discussion except the revelation of just who Mary Gallegher was. The ownership statement in, I think, Sparkling Stars lists her as owner.

You're right, I can't see a scenario where Temerson and Bowles "co-owned" anything, either. Hames' theory is that Bowles took over CatMan and Capt. Aero in lieu of unpaid printing bills and they weren't returned until Temerson raised the requisite funds to pay off the old debt. So our view is that Temerson was originally the publisher and Bowles/Holyoke the occasional printer. Then Bowles/Holyoke became publisher and printer. Eventually Temerson raises some capital, pays off his debt, becomes a publisher again and goes to a different(?) printer. Would be interested to know if Bowles had any holdings in the printing plant at 420 DeSoto in St. Louis, MO, where the Et-Es-Go/Continental were printed, OR the one in Meriden CT where some Tem/Nita/Brookwood books were printed. Just how much was Bowles involved in the printing industry?

(|:{>
Peace, Jim (|:{>

JVJ Publishing and VW inc.

Offline Bob Hughes

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: 0
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #77 on: April 15, 2010, 07:36:09 PM »
The St Louis plant was World Color Press before they moved to Sparta. See:

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/World-Color-Press-Inc-Company-History.html

Offline Bob Hughes

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: 0
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #78 on: April 15, 2010, 08:23:02 PM »
From Wikipedia (I know, I know...)
Quote
In March 1924, a newspaper in Waterbury, Connecticut purchased a Goss International single-width press to use in printing color newspaper comics sections. The Knickerbocker Press  of Albany, New York, and the Springfield Republican of Springfield, Massachusetts, approached the Republican about using the press to print their own color comics supplements. The Springfield Union soon afterward did as well. The Eastern Color Printing Company, incorporated in August 1928 with William B. Pape as its vice president and principal executive officer, acquired the press and replaced it with a Goss four-deck press. The company acquired additional presses in 1929 and 1931. During this time period, Eastern, headquartered at 61 Leavenworth Street in Waterbury, established itself in the pulp magazine industry by being one of the few firms to print color covers for the pulps.

Quote
1941
 Finding it necessary to do [its] own cover printing and binding for its successful comic books, Eastern acquires the Curtiss-Way plant in Meriden. Curtiss-Way was a Meriden printing facility dating back at least as far as 1895, when it was known as the Converse Publishing Company.

Most of the useful information in this article seems to be stolen from the CT Historical Society Exhibit  "Heroes, Heartthrobs, and Horrors" about the birth of the comic book in Connecticut.  Sadly this article, which I remember reading, is no longer on line.  I hope the mistakes here (like M. C. Gaines selling his comics to Dell before founding EC) weren't in it.

Anyhow, the Springfield Republican did at one time print their stuff in Connecticut.  And the Curtiss Way plant in Meriden seems to have printed covers, (often not printed in the same place as the insides of comics) and then bound them together.


Offline archiver_USA

  • Super Donor!
  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21
  • Karma: 40
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #79 on: April 16, 2010, 04:02:47 AM »

Offline mmiichael

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 1
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #80 on: April 16, 2010, 11:31:46 PM »
Mike Feldman sees a connection between Speed Comics and Speed Pulps- the successor to the Spicy line.
I can't find this connection, other than Barreaux (did I spell it right that time?). I don't even think the time periods match.

Hi Bob, jumping in here.  Been out of this stuff for a while.  The above is not true and I never asserted it.

I'm amazed reading these threads how out of the loop people are about the publishing business.  Comic book history is not Biblical scholarship.  Information provided by the marginal publishers was a mailing requirement - not Holy Writ.

Distributors like PDC and Kable fronted lines often in tandem with printers and paper brokers.  People like Sherman Bowles did not want their names to appear. But he was Holyoke.  Most of the jobs came from his dedicated comic supplement press...

Seem to have run out of space here.

« Last Edit: April 17, 2010, 01:22:55 AM by mmiichael »

Offline Bob Hughes

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: 0
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #81 on: April 17, 2010, 06:27:46 AM »
Mike, I may have misquoted you (or misquoted someone who misquoted you).  Bowles is Holyoke. That much we've got straight.  No question.  He liked to pretend he wasn't.  That much we've got straight.

The guys we're still wondering about are Temerson (where did he go while Bowles was publishing Cat-Man?), and Greenwald (was he fronting for PDC? or somebody else?).  We're all quite aware that printers and distributors front these guys money and then seize their assets when they can't pay it back.

The interesting wrinkle in the Holyoke case, is that both Fox and Temerson somehow got their lines back from Holyoke (Bowles). The Fox stuff is documented in court filings.  Temerson, not so much.   

There's a lot of stuff on the internet that attempts to link Carnahan via Barreaux to Trojan.  It's even in Jerry's Who's Who.  I don't find any evidence to support that.  Do you?

Offline JVJ (RIP)

  • VIP Uploaders
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1052
  • Karma: 58
  • paix
    • ImageS Magazine
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #82 on: April 17, 2010, 10:00:39 AM »
Hi Bob, jumping in here.  Been out of this stuff for a while.  The above is not true and I never asserted it.

I'm amazed reading these threads how out of the loop people are about the publishing business.  Comic book history is not Biblical scholarship.  Information provided by the marginal publishers was a mailing requirement - not Holy Writ.

Distributors like PDC and Kable fronted lines often in tandem with printers and paper brokers.  People like Sherman Bowles did not want their names to appear. But he was Holyoke.  Most of the jobs came from his dedicated comic supplement press...

Hi, Mike,
The last question I asked was whether or not Bowles had anything to do with World Color Press at 420 DeSoto in St. Louis? While we appreciate the impact of distributors and printers on the various smaller companies, it only kicks the research difficulty up a notch as we attempt to push the curtain back. I don't believe we're "out of the loop." It's quite obvious that Bowles didn't want to be seen fronting the comics. Okay, that explains Holyoke and Mary Gallegher. Now, if you have the information, can you tell us who Ray R. Hermann or Marjorie May were fronting for? Who owned the presses at Meriden and at 420 DeSoto (World Color, of course, but which comics did they have a stake in)?

It's one thing to maintain that there are connections behind connections, but that doesn't make them impenetrable - just more difficult to ascertain. Who were the front men for these presses? How were the distributors aligned with the various printing companies? How DID Temerson get his comics back from Bowles/Holyoke/Gallegher? Things happened for a reason. This is history - which is not Biblical Allegory, but discernible (we hope) fact.

Come on in and join the fun. The water's murky, but it's fine.

(|:{>
Peace, Jim (|:{>

JVJ Publishing and VW inc.

Offline mmiichael

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 1
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #83 on: April 17, 2010, 11:46:55 AM »
Guys,

The point I try to emphasize is that the indicia and other publisher supplied information cannot always be used as Gospel.  My information sources are broader and deeper and I think I have a clearer picture of the scenarios.

I've had extensive conversations with real old-timers like Jack Adams who was IND's general manager, the hands on guy, 1939-53.  Other stories even first hand accounts of Bowles with people who he backed.

Comics were a good investment by 1940, with the success rate being 60-70%.  Various deals were cut with distributors, printers, paper suppliers and outside dabblers, often lawyers.  Layers of obfuscation were created to obscure the money sources.

People like Leo Greewald and Temerson where hired gun nominal publishers given the task of making sure product came down the pike in time and on budget.  They were the ones who put their name on the periodicals, for legal and postal requirements, but at best were front men with minority participation.

A problem is these mags changed hands and ownership positions all the time, often issue to issue.  PDC typically would front the credit line for paper and printing (80% of the costs) and take a 25% position in a start-up company.  When sales were below expectations and bills were unpaid, they increased their shareholding to the point they were in control.  Then a decision was made whether to keep the original crew and publisher or tune the operation over to a new 'packager.'

There was a crisis on the newsstand s in mid-1940 when Britain was fighting for its existence and everyone was glued to their radio sets.  Too many new comics on the stand, many with unappealing contents, and there was something of an implosion.

Publishers and distributors, often the same people, huddled and decided they had to get more reliable professional content management...

Ex-porn guys like Greenwald and Carnahan were out and a new crop of comics professionals were sought. Greenwald initially oversaw an operation from which content for both Centaur and Ace were generated.  He was moved elsewhere if I recall, maybe to girly mags.

More to it than that, of course.  There was a war on with the independents against the America News Company stranglehold on distribution, and comics lead the way in breaking their monopoly in many regions.

More comics meant less space for other products, and printing prices came down as new arrangements were made for dedicated 4-color presses and redistribution channels.  

Maybe more later.

Mike




« Last Edit: April 17, 2010, 11:50:01 AM by mmiichael »

Offline mmiichael

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 1
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #84 on: April 17, 2010, 12:21:09 PM »
There's a lot of stuff on the internet that attempts to link Carnahan via Barreaux to Trojan.  It's even in Jerry's Who's Who.  I don't find any evidence to support that.  Do you?

Bob,

I think I supplied Jerry with the info on Carnahan.  Worth Carnahan was employed by the soft porn arm of what evolved to DC, c1927-39, initially as a staff artist eventually becoming inhouse art director and an editor.

He interfaced with Barreaux who was a feature packager and editor from the late 20s right into the early 50s when he reprinted his own comic features done for the SPICY/SPEED line for Trojan Comics.

These were carried by new distributor, Leader News, a Sampliner alternative company set up in 1939 to carry to more contentious stuff that they didn’t want connected to the burgeoning comics lines.  Frank Armer was CEO.  It was a consolation prize for him as he was taken out of the comics money loop.

The picture gets complicated because there were increasing mob interests in periodical distribution throughout the 40s that came to a head in 1947.   Bowles pulled out and the fringe comic publishing end served a different purpose.  A means of leverage with wholesalers. 

Offline JVJ (RIP)

  • VIP Uploaders
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1052
  • Karma: 58
  • paix
    • ImageS Magazine
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #85 on: April 17, 2010, 12:45:17 PM »
Yes, Michael,
we understand this general overview. You've made it clear. What we're asking for are the DETAILS. If you've talked to all of these guys "extensive conversations" - so can you give us some of the dirt instead of kicking up the same dust over and over again?

We'd all be grateful.

(|:{>
Peace, Jim (|:{>

JVJ Publishing and VW inc.

Offline JVJ (RIP)

  • VIP Uploaders
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1052
  • Karma: 58
  • paix
    • ImageS Magazine
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #86 on: April 17, 2010, 12:51:14 PM »
There's a lot of stuff on the internet that attempts to link Carnahan via Barreaux to Trojan.  It's even in Jerry's Who's Who.  I don't find any evidence to support that.  Do you?

Bob,

I think I supplied Jerry with the info on Carnahan.  Worth Carnahan was employed by the soft porn arm of what evolved to DC, c1927-39, initially as a staff artist eventually becoming inhouse art director and an editor.

He interfaced with Barreaux who was a feature packager and editor from the late 20s right into the early 50s when he reprinted his own comic features done for the SPICY/SPEED line for Trojan Comics.

These were carried by new distributor, Leader News, a Sampliner alternative company set up in 1939 to carry to more contentious stuff that they didn’t want connected to the burgeoning comics lines.  Frank Armer was CEO.  It was a consolation prize for him as he was taken out of the comics money loop.

The picture gets complicated because there were increasing mob interests in periodical distribution throughout the 40s that came to a head in 1947.   Bowles pulled out and the fringe comic publishing end served a different purpose.  A means of leverage with wholesalers. 

yeah, stuff like this.

Do you have actual dates for these events? I.E. did Bowles pull out in 1947? If so how did Sparkling Stars last until 1948? Did he divest himself of Holyoke? See, all of these stories you relate have some manifestation in the real world of comics and we're trying to establish that relationship.

(|:{>
Peace, Jim (|:{>

JVJ Publishing and VW inc.

Offline JVJ (RIP)

  • VIP Uploaders
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1052
  • Karma: 58
  • paix
    • ImageS Magazine
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #87 on: April 17, 2010, 01:05:15 PM »
Guys,

The point I try to emphasize is that the indicia and other publisher supplied information cannot always be used as Gospel.  My information sources are broader and deeper and I think I have a clearer picture of the scenarios.

I've had extensive conversations with real old-timers like Jack Adams who was IND's general manager, the hands on guy, 1939-53.  Other stories even first hand accounts of Bowles with people who he backed.
And those people are? And they said what? I get the sense that perhaps you don't want to be explicit. What's the problem?

Quote
Comics were a good investment by 1940, with the success rate being 60-70%.  Various deals were cut with distributors, printers, paper suppliers and outside dabblers, often lawyers.  Layers of obfuscation were created to obscure the money sources.

People like Leo Greewald and Temerson where hired gun nominal publishers given the task of making sure product came down the pike in time and on budget.  They were the ones who put their name on the periodicals, for legal and postal requirements, but at best were front men with minority participation.
makes sense, but "front men" for WHOM? Every thing you say seems valid but also seems deliberately vague. You keep telling us we don't the whole story and appear to only want to share the "chapter titles" of the real story. WUWT?

Quote
A problem is these mags changed hands and ownership positions all the time, often issue to issue.
again, give us a couple of real world examples if this was so prevalent.
Quote
 PDC typically would front the credit line for paper and printing (80% of the costs) and take a 25% position in a start-up company.  When sales were below expectations and bills were unpaid, they increased their shareholding to the point they were in control.  Then a decision was made whether to keep the original crew and publisher or tune the operation over to a new 'packager.'

There was a crisis on the newsstand s in mid-1940 when Britain was fighting for its existence and everyone was glued to their radio sets.  Too many new comics on the stand, many with unappealing contents, and there was something of an implosion.
Which "new comics" imploded? All of these statements you make are tantalizing and they have to have manifestations in the published world. Can YOU make the connections for us?

Quote
Publishers and distributors, often the same people, huddled and decided they had to get more reliable professional content management...

Ex-porn guys like Greenwald and Carnahan were out and a new crop of comics professionals were sought. Greenwald initially oversaw an operation from which content for both Centaur and Ace were generated.  He was moved elsewhere if I recall, maybe to girly mags.

More to it than that, of course.  There was a war on with the independents against the America News Company stranglehold on distribution, and comics lead the way in breaking their monopoly in many regions.

More comics meant less space for other products, and printing prices came down as new arrangements were made for dedicated 4-color presses and redistribution channels.  

Maybe more later.

Mike

Lots of questions????

(|:{>
Peace, Jim (|:{>

JVJ Publishing and VW inc.

Offline mmiichael

  • VIP
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 1
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #88 on: April 17, 2010, 02:07:45 PM »

Jim,

Trying to address your concerns. I do not take comic book sourced information seriously when it comes from marginal publishers.  You people do, and it leads you down endless rabbit holes.  Many of these publishing entities you are concerned about were simple bookkeeping fabrications designed to avoid tax implications, supply distributors with fodder, or move quantities of cheap paper.

The money sources were intentionally concealed.  You will never know who put up what and for how long.  The IRS had trouble penetrating these mazes even back then.   Jack Adams once told me how a mysterious company, what was it? – Lafayette? – came to be.  He was one of the investors.  Donenfeld, Gaines, Liebowitz, and a couple regional wholesalers put up some money for a news-educational title idea floating around.  I think there was a GUMPS newspaper strip title as well.

In the flood of new product 1946-7, the titles failed.  A failed venture.  Nothing in the printed material indicates the real back story.

SPARKLING STARS from what I recall was someone in publishing who decided to take a flyer on a comic title or two.  They likely cut a deal with Bowles on a line of credit.  Who knows who the guarantors were or if they assumed control at some point.

The position of distributor, paper supplier, printer, content provider we will never know on these small scale projects.  And I don't see how it matters all that much.  This obsession with separating companies and their product works with majors like DC, Fawcett, Dell, etc.  But breaks down as you approach the fringes.  A group of investors, which could be a couple lawyers, guys at the racetrack trying to launder profits, a hungry paper broker.   They might put some money in and pull out when they lost.

For Post Office regulations and the IRS publisher information had to be supplied.  But it didn’t necessarily reflect the true nature of the virtual operation.  Many companies were just a packager delivering material to a printer and the distributor handling the profit dispersement.  

My best guess is that in many cases a comic book started out with a distributor providing initial paper-printing credit, a group of wholesalers sharing the risk and the nominal publisher having a small stake which could grow if the thing flew.

It is 2010.  Most of the long-term company histories have been tracked in laborious detail.   Some titles will remain a mystery with only tantalizing published info as leads.   That is were the trail will end in most cases.

More intriguing would be investigation of the distribution and wholesaler network, a sorely neglected area of research.  In the 1940-54 period, Irwin Molasky, a large wholesaler in St Louis, who helped put DC on the map, occasionally bankrolled a title or two as a side venture.  He made sure his name never appeared in a publication, except maybe as a DC silent partner  on a couple occasions.  He was behind many of these loosey goosey operations you guys seem fixated on.  But I never see him mentioned anywhere.

I’m sorry if I sound supercilious but I’ve done a lot of primary research in to comics and ephemeral American publishing.  I provided a lot of inside dope when I participated in GCD boards.  Most of it ignored it seems.  

I see the same comics researchers running around on the same loop they were 20 years ago without much kn owledge of the bigger picture.  Expand your horizons and move beyond those indicias if you want deeper answers.


Mike


« Last Edit: April 17, 2010, 02:21:14 PM by mmiichael »

Offline Zog

  • Curator
  • Administrators
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 156
  • Karma: 1337
Re: Holyoke is a Myth...
« Reply #89 on: April 17, 2010, 02:36:27 PM »
mmiichael

I'm not entirely sure of what you are aiming for here, with your comments.
Do you want this thread to be stopped, because they are all wrong in the desire to hunt down obscure publishers (which seems to be the main point I draw from your comments)
Are you saying it's pointless and a waste of time, if so, they are enjoying themselves...it's their time to waste, and are harming no one.
You keep throwing up vague references without any solidity, you MUST know this is going to drive them insane, if you've read the whole thread.
The reason I posted this, is not to pick on you, but to try to prevent this descending into nastiness.
If you have some input, please put in a form that is more ...friendly to the aims of this thread.

If you have another form of attack, to track down publishers/owners/backers as you mentioned, start another thread, I am 100% certain that'll be better than seemingly, to me at least, in derailing this one.


 :)


Zog