Digital Comic Museum

General Category => Comic Related Discussion => Topic started by: brush on January 17, 2012, 03:14:18 PM

Title: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: brush on January 17, 2012, 03:14:18 PM

Hi,

After reviewing the recent scans of RULAH #21 (  http://digitalcomicmuseum.com/index.php?dlid=17077 ); I'd like to share a thought or two:


Puerile, execrable, inane and sleazy are a few adjectives befitting this golden-age schlock!!


Thanks for the scans! ^-^
Warren

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: Yoc on January 17, 2012, 03:15:38 PM

HA!
Glad you enjoyed it Warren and thanks for the capsule review.
:)

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: jfglade on January 17, 2012, 03:48:06 PM

Quote from: Yoc on January 17, 2012, 03:15:38 PM

HA!
Glad you enjoyed it Warren and thanks for the capsule review.
:)

 I rather enjoyed the issue, Yoc, particularly the prurient material.

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: Yoc on January 17, 2012, 03:50:06 PM

Good to hear Jon.
With so many uploads it's pretty rate that anyone has time to comment on them.
And Warren did it with tongue firmly in cheek which was fun too.

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: JVJ (RIP) on January 17, 2012, 05:09:23 PM

Quote from: brush on January 17, 2012, 03:14:18 PM

Hi,

After reviewing the recent scans of RULAH #21 (  http://digitalcomicmuseum.com/index.php?dlid=17077 ); I'd like to share a thought or two:


Puerile, execrable, inane and sleazy are a few adjectives befitting this golden-age schlock!!


Thanks for the scans! ^-^
Warren

And now you know why they aren't on my "Have List", Warren.

To each his own. Personally, I find most Iger Shop work of this era to be pretty much the same. You forgot "overpriced".

Peace, Jim (|:{>

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: narfstar on January 17, 2012, 06:53:44 PM

Some examples of "good girl" art have retained their collectiblity and price. They have a following. And now I have to go download the issue after such glowing reviews  :P

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: darkmark (RIP) on January 17, 2012, 11:37:10 PM

The best part about scans like these is that you don't have to unstick the pages afterwards.

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: JVJ (RIP) on January 18, 2012, 12:07:44 AM

I repeat, to each his own... :(

(|:{>

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: Yoc on January 18, 2012, 01:23:56 AM

True enough Jim. 
Some of these are like car accidents.  You can't look away even if you know you should.

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: Ami_GFX on January 18, 2012, 08:44:07 AM

If Victor Fox hadn't existed, someone would have had to invent him.

After all these years, I finally get to see what the good doctor Werthem kept me from seeing as a young boy. Kind of anticlimatic at my age but my 13 year old self might of thought differently--then again, maybe not. At 13 I was eagerly following such books as Jim Starlin's Warlock and I probably would have gotten a good laugh from the Rulah book but would have noticed the lack of such things as plot, story telling and good taste.

Still,in flesh per panel, this book is up for a posthumus award even for a Fox publication. ;)

Title: Re: Commentary: RULAH # 21
Post by: narfstar on January 18, 2012, 09:08:11 AM

Not just flesh but some of those poses  ::)