developed-responsibility
- +

Author Topic: Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32  (Read 2526 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John C

  • Administrators
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1316
  • Karma: 3
    • John's Blog
Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32
« on: January 31, 2011, 03:32:22 PM »
This may be too late for many (all?), but I stumbled across this today and figure it's probably of interest to those of you in Canada.

http://www.gutenbergnews.org/20110126/canadians-speak-out-on-copyright/

Just an FYI for the activists in the group...

Digital Comic Museum

Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32
« on: January 31, 2011, 03:32:22 PM »

Offline Yoc

  • S T A F F
  • Administrators
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15031
  • Karma: 57
  • 14 Years Strong!
Re: Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2011, 01:15:16 AM »
Thanks John!

Offline comicOD

  • DCM Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: 3
Re: Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2011, 10:25:52 AM »
This bill is in a committee stage right now. It's a bill that's been put
forth by the corporate lobbyists (surprise) from the U.S and Canada.

Offline skybandit

  • “There has to be evil so that good can prove its purity above it.” - Buddha
  • DCM Member
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 2
  • I don't sleep. I hate those little slices of death
Re: Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2011, 12:13:39 AM »
“There are men so godlike, so exceptional, that they naturally, by right of their extraordinary gifts, transcend all moral judgment or constitutional control: 'There is no law which embraces men of that caliber: they are themselves law.’” - Aristotle

Offline John C

  • Administrators
  • DCM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1316
  • Karma: 3
    • John's Blog
Re: Canadian Copyrights, Bill C-32
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2011, 05:45:35 AM »
It's of potential interest to us, actually.  I don't know of any examples, nor do I know how you'd prove such a thing, but it opens the possibility that a comic was created outside the United States for sale at least partially inside.

Those worrying about trademarks might also find this of interest:

http://www.cartoonbrew.com/classic/who-owns-betty-boop.html

The decision could be overturned on an appeal, of course, but the upshot is that the Ninth District Court concluded that a trademark can't block the use of public domain art.