This is intended to be a call for discussion, that I'm hoping will result in less confusion going forward.
The last few uploads by freddyfly and myself have been Jungle issues for which there are now multiple scans of each online. I've been labeling the title of my uploads with "-JVJ" at the end, but per past conventions, I've also been including "(diff ver)(c2c)" in there, since my uploads were a different scan, and provided a c2c version where the previous scan had been incomplete. Following these uploads, freddyfly has subsequently provided c2c versions of his original scans, using fill pages from my uploads, labeled "(first version upgrade; now c2c)". As a result, both books' title lines now seem to be more complicated than they need to be.
I'd like to suggest a simpler naming convention for cases like this where there are multiple scans for the same book online: rather than use "diff version" or "first version" or whatnot, just use a suffix for the origin of the scan. This could be "-JVJ" (which is already present on many scans) or "-freddyfly" or "-bhcomics" where appropriate. If all versions of a scan are c2c, then it seems unnecessary for them all to carry that label. My suggestion would be to label incomplete scans as such (e.g. "inc", "-ifc -ibc -bc", "-cf", "no ads" or whatever is appropriate).
I realize that it's nice to label a scan as "update" or "upgraded" to let people know there's a new version they might want to download, but unfortunately, the "upgraded" will probably still be there in the title a year from now.
I would welcome further discussion on this. (Including "if it ain't broke, don't fix it")